Data collection continued relatively smoothly throughout the observations in Polson Park. It was helpful to have chosen to record some data that I did not know for sure would be relevant from the onset, since presence of wind, rain, and anthropogenic noise proved to have some relevence as I looked further into existing academic research and the study continued.
Something I am learning is that more data (especially number of observations) is always a good thing. Even if some data collected does not end up factoring into specific areas of the anticipated paper, it can help to raise questions.
As mentioned in my previous post, length of observation for data collection was shorten to increase the accuracy of counts for data. Two more data sets were collected at this length, and more could have been collected with greater ease if the lengths were shorter.