Snyder-Middleswarth Natural Area
Comparison of results:
Fastest Sampling strategy : Area, Random or systematic (12 hr, 5 mins)
Percentage Error: Area, Random or systematic (Quadrat (x+10,y+10))
Eastern Hemlock = (469.9-487.5)/487.5 = 3.6% (most accurate common species)
Sweet Birch = (117.5-100)/100 = 17.5% (least accurate common species)
Yellow Birch = (108.9-95.8)/95.8 = 13.7%
Chestnut Oak = (87.5-62.5)/62.5 = 40%
Red Maple = (118.9-108.3)/108.3 = 9.8%
Striped maple = (17.5-45.8)/45.8 = 61.8% (least accurate rare species)
White Pine = (8.4-20.8)/20.8 = 59.6% (most accurate rare species)
Accuracy declined for rare species
Percentage Error: Area, Random or systematic (random specified quadrants) (13 hr, 12 mins)
Eastern Hemlock = (469.9-404)/ 404= 16.3% (least accurate common species)
Sweet Birch = (117.5-116)/116 = 1.3% (most accurate common species)
Yellow Birch = (108.9-100)/100 = 8.9%
Chestnut Oak = (87.5-84)/84 = 4.2%
Red Maple = (118.9-148)/148 = 19.7%
Striped maple = (17.5-64)/64 = 72.7% (least accurate rare species)
White Pine = (8.4-0)/0 = 0% (most accurate rare species)
Accuracy increased for rare species
The White Pine percentage error makes me think there weren’t enough sample plots
Percentage Error: Area, haphazard (completely random selection) (12 hr, 25 mins)
Eastern Hemlock = (469.9-533.3)/533.3 = 11.9% (most accurate common species)
Sweet Birch = (117.5-104.2)/104.2 = 12.7% (least accurate common species)
Yellow Birch = (108.9-137.5)/137.5 = 20.8%
Chestnut Oak = (87.5-50)/50 = 75%
Red Maple = (118.9-79.2)/79.2 = 50%
Striped maple = (17.5-20.8)/20.8 = 15.9% (most accurate rare species)
White Pine = (8.4-4.2)/4.2 = 100% (least accurate rare species)
Accuracy declined for rare species
Sorry it is cut into two images, I couldn’t capture the graph all in one image on my screen
I love this little exercise because it shows nothing is perfect but that method and effort does impact results … the question is, how do we account for error?