Reflections

This process has lead me to think a lot about the meaning of quantifying patterns/processes within ecosystem dynamics.  Every single piece, pattern, and process exists within an interconnected dynamic and unique network of the movement of matter and energy. Ecosystems are in constant flux.

I found it very difficult to solidify an intentional and concise topic for my research. I continuously debunked every idea I had because there was always another interaction to consider. I found lots of pieces but struggled to find one pattern to focus on.

I had a broad idea: The amount of energy in water flow at any given point along the river predicts the progression of the vegetation in the ecotone between river and forest.

The rivers structural effects are easily seen in a geomorphological sense but I wished to explore the ecologic relationship between river and vegetation. I also wanted to incorporate the “energy” of the river somehow.

I struggled to figure out how to measure the “energy” of the river, or what that truly impacted or meant. Initially I was going to take advantage of hydrodynamics around a bend in the river. Then I observed that the topography seemed to be more indicative of the speed of the river than the location on the bend. I ended up devising a way of measuring the velocity of the water along the edge of the river. Kinetic energy of river flow. I stuck with this idea, honestly because at this point I was running out of time. I had used all my time to ponder continuously. So, velocity of water near the rivers edge it was. After taking all my measurements I wished I had devised a better way to explore the “energy of the river.” Even though the plan worked, I have cut the velocity measurements out of my research to hone in on how the proximity to the river effects the tree species composition. To say that I had difficulties narrowing my scope would be an understatement.

I made many changes to my design throughout the process. Nancy and Robyn  I thank you for responding to my many ramblings. I am content with the study design I ended up creating and implicating based off of the hypothesis: Proximity to river influences tree species composition in riparian zones

If I were to do it again I would have leaned into the characteristics of submerged trees. What substrate are they growing in? What angle is the trunk at? What type of species? How do these species differ from those not found submerged? How do submerged and not-submerged trees of the same species differ?

Engaging in this practice has increased my appreciation of how ecological theory is developed. I appreciate the effort it takes to start with a question and devise a plan to answer it, especially when the question involves an ecosystem.  I also cant help feeling like in the process of trying to quantify something infinitely complex, we constrict our knowledge. I recognize that in the realm of modern science it is important to be able to conduct unbiased observations and analysis to support the growing inventory of scientific information available. The scientific method is important and certainly has its role. I wish to acknowledge that merging local indigenous knowledge (when granted) with ecological studies is a beautiful way to look at a pattern from more than one angle.