Blog post 2

The article I chose is “Phenotypic plasticity facilitates resistance to climate change in a highly variable environment”It was published in Oecologia volume 169, pages 269–279 (2012).DOI of the article: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2191-x

Link for the article :

https://doi-org.uml.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2191-x

This paper is a professional, by-peer-reviewed research study. To back up my claim, I would state that each author is a recognized authority in their profession and a member of a reputable organization. Before publication, it is additionally reviewed by at least one referee. Additionally, there are in-text citations, and a reference list and bibliography are included at the end. It also includes a method and result; therefore, we can claim that it is academic content.

 

Reference list:

Richter, S., Kipfer, T., Wohlgemuth, T. et al. Phenotypic plasticity facilitates resistance to climate change in a highly variable environment. Oecologia 169, 269–279 (2012). https://doi-org.uml.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2191-x

 

One thought to “Blog post 2”

  1. The key is often how do you know it was reviewed by at least one referee? Journal websites often state that they are peer-reviewed and the acknowledgements section of a paper will often refer to reviewers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *