For my review subject, which studied the range of moths found in the reformation area, it was vital to collect information. I’ll give restraints on my way of dealing with information collection in this blog entry.
Sampling Strategy: I expressed an examining procedure that remembered every one of the four of the reformation area’s zones for requests to get complete information. Separated into two quadrants, T1 through T4, each zone was therefore developed. The park’s numerous ecosystems’ moth diversity has been thoroughly and systematically studied due to its design.
T1-Near to the Duck Pond.
T2- Near to the Flower Garden
T3-Near to the Bloedel Conservatory
T4- Near to the large trees
Species Observation: Through careful observation, I discovered that various species of moths were present in each location. The table exhibits the circulation of various types of moths in the various zones.
Challenges faced: One of the many problems that had to be solved during the data collection process was getting an accurate and complete identification of the species. However, these difficulties proved the significance of perfectionism and accuracy in ecological studies.
Key findings: The highest moth activity occurred at night. Besides, moths showed a leaning for trees and shrubs rather than small botanical plants; one animal type was especially connected to canals.
Conclusion: As I continue my research, I learn more about the importance of dynamic data collection efforts in knowing the complexities of moth ecology. Our insight into moth conduct and chosen natural surroundings is extended by each perception and data point of interest, which assists with revealing biological management plans and protection activities.