I had no issues summarizing the field data and graphing it.
The majority of quadrats (70%) in the “moist” zone contained the study organism, compared to only 20% of the “dry” zone quadrats and 30% of “wet” zone quadrats. As expected, the species is more prevalent in the moist zone. I was a bit surprised that it could still be found in the dry and wet zones, although in smaller numbers. There could be other factors limiting its growth in these areas, such as competition with other species. It would be interesting to conduct a more in-depth study looking at factors like competition, herbivory, and other soil conditions to determine their influence on the study organism.