Comparative analysis of three different sampling strategies used in virtual forest tutorial

Three different sampling strategies were used in the virtual forest tutorial.The results of percentage errors in each one are provided in the table below

  Random Systematic Haphazard
Red Maple 15.90 11.22 13.4
Witch Hazel 14.62 9.5 18.6
Striped Maple 35.55 49.82 12.9
Downy Juneberry 42.90 52.93 absent

Random Sampling Technique had the fastest estimated sampling time of 4 hours and 50 minutes.The change in the accuracy was observed to be related to the species abundance.I found the random Sampling technique to be most accurate.

One thought to “Comparative analysis of three different sampling strategies used in virtual forest tutorial”

  1. How fast were the other ones? They are usually around 12-13 hours and show only small differences between strategies. Do these samples and errors indicate anything about sample size for both common and rare species?

Leave a Reply to rreudink Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *