Blog Post 2: Sources of Scientific Information

1. Source

Title: “Nitrate and ammonium uptake in 21 common species of moss from Vancouver Island, British Columbia”
Authors: B.J. Hawkins, E. May, and S. Robbins
Published in: Botany, Volume 83, 2005
Link to Source: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0154
2. Classification

The paper should be classified as “academic peer-reviewed primary research material.”

3. Documentation and Justification

Authorship: The source is written by B.J. Hawkins, E. May, and S. Robbins, researchers with expertise in botany and ecology, indicating that the authors have a strong background in the study’s subject matter.

In-Text Citations and References: The article includes in-text citations and a bibliography, demonstrating that the authors have engaged with existing literature to support their research.

Journal and Peer Review: The article is published in Botany, a well-respected peer-reviewed scientific journal, which indicates that the research underwent rigorous evaluation by experts in the field before publication.

Content and Structure: The paper presents original research, including a clear methodology, results, and discussion sections. It reports on an empirical study of nitrate and ammonium uptake in moss species, which contributes new knowledge to the field of botany and ecology.

Based on these points, and according to the guidelines from the tutorial “How to Evaluate Sources of Scientific Information,” this article fits the criteria for academic, peer-reviewed primary research material.

One thought to “Blog Post 2: Sources of Scientific Information”

Leave a Reply to rreudink Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *